MEDICOM'S KING JOEImagine that you've spent weeks/months working on your home-made-from-scratch rendition of a media property that's never been commercially produced... only to hear that Megabucks Corp. has just announced release of their ultimate version! Bummer, huh? Nope, that's not me. I learned that lesson a long time ago (hint: if you put large breasts on everything, you're usually pretty safe). I'd started making a 12" King Joe a long time ago, but I didn't get very far and it would have been a bear of a project. So when I found Banpresto's 14" vinyl King Joe, I was content to do a few modifications to improve its articulation. At that time I had no idea that Medicom would ever produce one; once they announced, I jumped at the opportunity to preorder it. I had pretty high expectations: From the Banpresto vinyl, I knew that a major obstacle to achieving articulation and remaining faithful to the costume design was the fact that the TV show's costume was a rubber suit. Admittedly, this looks kinda funky for a robot that you'd expect to be made of some kind of metal, but dem's da facts of vintage TV shows. ("It's a very special metal that we aliens use to make robots and condoms!") A faithful reproduction of the costume at doll-scale would have to be done with rubber, and who better to do it than Medicom? After months of waiting through delays, it finally arrived... and to be perfectly honest, I was a little disappointed. It's not Medicom's fault: They did a fine job. I have no complaints about any major aspect of their production-- quality, detail, fidelity, fit, finish, etc. (Okay, the price...this one reflects a price hike above an already steep price). The detailing of the head antennas and the clear plastic chest panels are much better than Banpresto's efforts; the rivetless thigh panels are more faithful to the costume. It's a neat-looking piece that fits in well with the rest of their "Real Action Hero" line of Ultra-stuff.
I couldn't be disappointed with the lack of lighting effects since none of their other dolls have them either. It's a shame though, since the costume lighting effects are a big part of their "look", and the King Joe costume has an interesting set of sequenced light effects. As a practical matter, the omission makes sense: Lighting and sound effects are a gimmick that would probably be appreciated for only a brief initial period of the doll's lifetime. The aging battery would then become a liability. This would add quite a bit to the price since the design and assembly would have to deal with complications of light arrays, battery and switch placement, in addition to design of the timing circuit board. Given the already steep price and limited appeal of these things, I'm sure that Medicom didn't want to press the issue.
Along those lines, I also couldn't be disappointed that King Joe's hands are totally un-poseable. Like others in this series, they're like flexible molded gloves that have been sculpted as part of the arm casting. The armature's standard-issue "hands" (flippers, actually) don't even reach into the hand casting. That's not a big loss, since the flippers really wouldn't do much even if they did. This isn't to say that there's no room for improvement. It seems obvious to me (now) that Medicom should have made a more robust armature exclusively for this specialized line of rubber-suited dolls. The RAH body works fine for dolls wearing traditional outfits which show skin or a humanoid contour, but it's a poor choice for this line. The reasons why they don't are likely economic: It's cost effective to produce a single universal body style for all their different lines. They're willing to do simple variations to customize it for specific monsters (mainly the head section), but charge considerably more for radical departures (like Garamon). The main reason for my disappointment is pretty silly: Banpresto King Joe has been towering over the others in my collection for a long time now, and Medicom's is so much smaller. King Joe was a truly formidable opponent for Ultraseven; camera angles and shot framing of the TV episode amplified the drama and gave (me) the impression that King Joe should look much tougher than a run-of-the-mill alien. Taking BKJ's place and posed next to Medicom's Pegassa Seijin, Medicom's King Joe looks so puny, so meek. I recognize that it's not valid grounds for disappointment: The Medicom version is sized correctly, and is slightly taller than their Ultraseven. |


King Joe variants have appeared in at least a couple of post-60s Ultra-series episodes: In the 1999 Ultraseven "Duplicated Man" video (center images), and in a 2005 Ultraman Max episode (right images). Both episodes reveal a different approach to the costume; instead of using a full rubber suit, the costumes are a mixture of rigid and flexible pieces (much like an armoured knight). I think this works and looks better than the full rubber suit, since the parts which look like they shouldn't smoosh, (usually) don't. It was interesting to see how they made the changes, as they clearly made an effort to retain as much of the original King Joe costume design as possible. Of the two, I prefer the 1999 Ultraseven version: The Ultraman Max version was heavily mixed with computer graphics footage, so perhaps that's why it looks somewhat stylized? In my opinion it looks cheaper; the lower pic shows the rubber suit's smooshable hips/codpiece area, just like the original.
BANPRESTO'S KING JOE, REV. 2Since the role of the official King Joe had been filled, I was free to see BKJ as a King Joe variant, maybe a "Mark II", or a "Super King Joe" (or with large robotty breasts, a "Queen Joe"?). This meant that I had no inhibitions about cutting him up to make articulation improvements and to get away from the full rubber suit paradigm.
My revisions to BKJ were quick & easy (since I'd already done the arms): The first and most obvious thing to do was to separate the upper torso from the lower along the natural seamline. This would permit full balljoint-like posing of the upper torso instead of the simple built-in rotational articulation. Since this wasn't the "real" King Joe, I wasn't concerned about preserving the original peaked shape of the sculpted-on "belt" (which happened to cross the original articulation seam). Next up were the legs. I'd originally been too lazy to do anything about them since they served their purpose (to keep it standing up). One of the technical problems had been with the bellows at the knees and ankles. I'd been too lazy to make flexible ones, and the bellows I'd made for the arms didn't hold their shapes very well (ideally, they need to be rigid enough to hold their shape, but flexible enough not to inhibit articulation). I decided to use the vinyl casting's (semi)rigid bellows, but to separate them, ridge by ridge, and join them with a stretchy material backing, like a sleeve. That way they'd retain their shape, but the sleeve would be somewhat flexible. It's not the way bellows really work, but it's an easy compromise of look & functionality. (I wasn't expecting the doll be able to pose on bended knees-- armoured figures typically have pretty limited poseability.) Separating the legs from the hips was maybe the most difficult part, from a design perspective: What would work best and not look really funky? The central problem is that articulation works best when the two abutting sides have smooth lines between them; otherwise, the parts bind. King Joe's design, with its wide legs and glommed-on cylindrical projections are about as far from smooth-lined as possible. That's not an issue for a full rubber suit, but causes some challenges for a mix of rigid & flexible materials. The videos provided examples of two different approaches, and I decided to follow the 1999 version's example, where the separation line is kept fairly straight by turning the top of the legs into a belt between the cylinders. They'd actually redesigned the parts to make it work better, and filled the gap with a dark, flexible material. I was working with a straight reproduction of the original design, so I didn't have the same degree of freedom to make it work as well, unless I invested a bunch of time in resculpting the area. Nawwww.... The legs were cut off from the hip section following the natural seamline around the crotch & cylinders, and cutting across the top of the leg in between. It became clear that I needed to keep the legs aligned with the hip section. This meant that the complex outline at the boundary of the legs and hips looked good only when aligned at their original orientation: If the legs were rotated or twisted, they wouldn't line up with the hips, and there would be gaping holes. That limited articulation to forward/backward and side-to-side sweeps. It's not an ideal setup for hip articulation, but sometimes you make do with what you're given. The legs were aligned to the hips by running elastic from the inner and outer sides of the legs up through retaining guides attached to the inside of the hip section. These are strung upwards through the armature, similar to the way a vintage GI Joe's legs are strung together through the torso and to the neck. To put it another way, the armature is wearing pant legs held up by suspenders, and the suspenders are threaded through channels on the inside of the hip section. The final challenge was figuring out how to join the upper torso with the lower section. This didn't need to be anything real elaborate, since the doll's heavy enough for a loose press fit to be acceptable. Basically, the torso just needed something to retain the armature's trunk so that it didn't rattle around inside the torso-- a rubber bellows tubing (from a car) did the job nicely, held in place by the elastic that tensions the arms. The aforementioned concept of "fit" is important for "posing performance" (for lack of a better term). When using an inner armature, it works best when exterior parts are secured or fitted to the armature in some manner, instead of floating around it. I've used the hips section as the "index point", and screwed the armature to that section. The leg sections are padded on the inside so that they generally track with the armature. If you don't do this, repositioning the armature won't necessarily produce any difference in the posing of the exterior parts-- it's a common-sense concept, like why you have to grab the steering wheel to turn your car. For the purposes of this article, this a good stopping point. I've covered some basic structural modifications that you might want to make in a project like this, before tackling the details. That's a completely different phase, where you can exercise your creativity and finishing skills (I'm a slacker in that area). Offhand, I see some obvious opportunities for improvement sub-projects-- the head antennas, the visor & chest panels... it would be fun to open up some panels to put groovy mechanical detailing inside, or maybe even lights (There are plenty of LED "chaser" schematics on the 'Net.). Basically, you can get as nerdy as you want, if you've got the time!
WRAP IT UPA review would probably be of limited value anyway, except as 'Net documentation of one of Medicom's releases. A true die-hard fan of this stuff would just buy the thing, like I did. If you've bought one of their releases before, there are no big surprises here. Medicom has the market sewn up, so it's not about comparison shopping: Basically, if you don't buy when they release, you probably won't be able to later.
|
--09/08/07
VISOR LIGHT KIT After finishing the first part of this article, I Googled for LED chase circuits and found plenty of schematics websites, but I also found Quality Kits, which had bagged LED kits with printed circuit boards and all the parts you'd need (except the 9-volt battery connector). It's much easier to get it all in one place than digging through your own parts boxes and placing small orders for what you're missing. The downside is that it's pretty hard to tell what the kits do from a written description. Unless you're fluent in electronics or breadboard the circuit before you build it, you find out exactly what it does after you've built it and power it up... if you've built it correctly and you haven't fried any parts during assembly. That would be me, and that's why I was surprised when the light kit didn't do what I thought it was going to do. (But at least I'd built it right and hadn't fried anything.) The main challenge of assembling circuits this way is planning how leads should connect so that the assemblies are strong, the components don't get flexed loose, and nothing is likely to cause shorts. Generally speaking, rigid component leads should be short so they don't flex much. To do this, you have to pre-tin as much as you can, and solder hot and quick. I used a 100W Weller soldering gun because it melts solder so quickly, since I was soldering 2-3 mm of LED/diode leads without a heat sink. If you dwell too long with lower power, there's more cumulative heat build-up, which tends to fry components. (I learned this basic "truism" from soldering surface mount LEDs, which are a little smaller than matchheads.) As for the circuit: I thought it would be 2 LEDs chasing each other down two lanes of 6 LEDs each, in a circular clockwise pattern-- just like the lights on the TV version of King Joe! Wishful thinking, I suppose. Instead, it's two rows of LEDs flashing in tandem, one direction and then the other. Kinda like the Knight Rider car, or the the Cylon eye-sweep, except it's two LEDs at a time. It looks kinda kewl, nonetheless. Besides, the objective had already been compromised: I'd intended to use white 3mm LEDs, but they were outrageously expensive-- I got a 25 pack of green 3mm LEDs for the price of a couple of white ones. I still think that lights are a gimmick that will entertain you for a only a brief period of the doll's lifetime; however, constructing and installing a light kit can bring many hours of entertainment, and maybe teach something along the way. Besides that, the project can be fodder for a website article addendum, with the rare opportunity to show off some cheap action video:
VIDEO FOOTAGE (343KB .WMV FORMAT)(sorry, the sound effects were dubbed...)--09/16/07
|
